Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Mclaurin v. Syracuse Police Department et al
as 9:2022cv00372
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mclaurin
Defendant:
City of Syracuse Police Department and Onondaga County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. Onondaga County Justice Center et al
as 9:2021cv00797
Plaintiff:
Johnny William Boyde
Defendant:
Onondaga County Justice Center, City of Syracuse, Deputy Quigley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Boyde v. City of Syracuse
as 9:2021cv00731
Petitioner:
Johnny William Boyde
Respondent:
City of Syracuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Boyde v. City of Syracuse
as 9:2021cv00269
Petitioner:
Johnny William Boyde
Respondent:
City of Syracuse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stephens v. City of Syracuse et al
as 9:2017cv00502
Plaintiff:
Raheim J. Stephens
Defendant:
City of Syracuse, New York State, Deputy Mazzoni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Victory v. Pataki
as 13-3592
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Albert Lopez Victory
Defendant - Appellee:
George Pataki, Former Governor of the State of New York in his official capacity, James M. Kindler, Chief Assistant District Attorney, New York County, John F. Keenan and others
Beyah v. Laidlaw
as 13-903
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murad Hasan Beyah
Defendant - Appellee:
John Laidlaw, Paul Berry, Christine Sztechmiller and others
Beyah v. Laidlaw
as 11-4793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Murad Hasan Beyah
Defendant - Appellee:
John Laidlaw, Paul Berry, Christine Sztechmiller and others
Williams v. Falkowski et al
as 9:2011cv00826
Plaintiff:
Mileke Williams
Defendant:
E. Falkowski, J. Ballagh, City of Syracuse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. City of Utica et al
as 11-1422
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Tommy Walker, III
Defendant - Appellee:
City of Utica, Town of Dewitt and City of Syracuse
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
