Cases 21 - 30 of 653
Curtiss v. Lanuza et al
as 1:2023cv15035
Plaintiff:
Daniel Curtiss
Defendant:
Lanuza, M Smith, D. Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sharkey v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv15030
Plaintiff:
Markees Sharkey
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, J. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv07934
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Davis v. Cagbabuana et al
as 1:2023cv06556
Plaintiff:
Christople Davis
Defendant:
Cagabuana, Thomas Dart, County of Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05150
Plaintiff:
DeRayShaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas Dart, Rocco Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Huggins v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv05123
Plaintiff:
DeRay Shaun Huggins
Defendant:
County Of Cook, M Anguiano, Thomas Dart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv04917
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, E. Duran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv04915
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Amanda Gallegos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv04910
Plaintiff:
Tyrese Deon Coleman
Defendant:
County Of Cook, Thomas J. Dart, Susan Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. County Of Cook et al
as 1:2023cv04844
Plaintiff:
Christople Davis
Defendant:
County Of Cook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
