Cases 11 - 20 of 668
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21026
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Hoops Corporation et al v. Secretary, U.S. Department of State et al
as 1:2024cv20882
Plaintiff:
Hoops Corporation and Angela Di Porzio
Defendant:
Secretary ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, Director UR M JADDOU, Attorney General MERRICK B. GARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Benefield, et al v. Department of Justice, et al
as 3:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Cynthia D. Benefield and Makayla B. Arnold
Defendant:
Department of Justice, United States (Military) of America, Duval Teachers Union and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Oh v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00399
Plaintiff:
Justin Yeol Oh
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cortez v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Clara Cortez
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cesar v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00398
Plaintiff:
Son Oswald Cesar
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv20561
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0551 Administrative Procedure Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
