Cases 1 - 10 of 2,066
U.S. Bank National Association v. O'Hara
as 24-1595
Plaintiff:
U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, as Trustee for the LXS 200612N
Defendant:
EDWARD J. O'HARA, FRANCIS O'HARA, Francis G. O'Hara, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY, Internal Revenue Service and others
Hedges v. United States of America, et al.
as 24-3687
Plaintiff:
CRAIG JOSEPH HEDGES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, DAVID A. HUBBART, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, DOJ - UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Ronald Scherer v. JP Morgan Chase & Co., et al
as 24-11874
Plaintiff:
RONALD EARL SCHERER
Defendant:
J.P. MORGAN CHASE & CO. 7.00% CAPITAL SECURITIES SERIES J, JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. and others
CAMPUZANO et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2024cv01652
Plaintiff:
DIANA CAMPUZANO, STUART FORCE, BEATRIZ GONZALEZ and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, GENE L. DODARO, GENERAL ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
State of New Jersey v. Mnuchin
as 24-1499
Plaintiff:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW YORK and STATE OF CONNECTICUT
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN, in his official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of the Treasury, CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Village of Scarsdale, New York v. Internal Revenue Service
as 24-1503
Plaintiff:
VILLAGE OF SCARSDALE, NEW YORK
Defendant:
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, CHARLES PAUL RETTIG, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Internal Revenue, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Waldrup et al v. Department of the Treasury et al
as 3:2024cv00158
Plaintiff:
Phil R. Waldrup and Anne B. Waldrup
Defendant:
Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Services, D. Setzer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
