Cases 1 - 10 of 242
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
as 1:2024mc00034
Petitioner:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Respondent:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Fair Credit Reporting Act
Mitchell v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 24-292
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHANTEL MITCHELL
Defendant / Appellee:
OFFICE DEPOT, INC.
Castellanos v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 1:2023cv04665
Plaintiff:
Judy Castellanos
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Silas v. City of New York
as 23-7227
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REYNOLD B. SILAS
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF YONKERS, CITY OF YONKERS POLICE DEPARTMENT, Detective CAVE, of The City of Yonkers Police Department (Shield # unknown) and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and JOHN DOE, shield # unknown, individually and in his official capacity
Brown v. Office Depot, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00287
Plaintiff:
Teresa Brown
Defendant:
Office Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Shan Harter
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Harter v. The Home Depot, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03705
Plaintiff:
Shan Harter
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc. and Satco Products, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00979
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Swarts v. The Home Depot, Inc.
as 4:2023cv00995
Plaintiff:
Jason Swarts
Defendant:
The Home Depot, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
