Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Young (PS) v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00873
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell (PS) v. Office of Pardon Attny., Dept. of Justice
as 1:2023cv01876
Petitioner:
Brooks J. Terrell
Respondent:
Office of Pardon Attny., Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. Garland et al
as 1:2023cv01827
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
Merrick Garland, Michael Horowitz, Dept. of HHS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jordan v. United States Dept. of Justice et al
as 1:2022cv03317
Petitioner:
Bralen Lamar Jordan
Respondent:
United States Dept. of Justice Federal Bureau of Prisons, E. Conorer and Ausp Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Terrell v. US Dept. of Justice
as 1:2022cv03017
Petitioner:
Brooks Terrell
Respondent:
US Dept. of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Young v. United States Dept of Justice
as 1:2021cv01985
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
United States Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Dept. of Justice
as 1:2021cv01452
Petitioner:
Timothy Doyle Young
Respondent:
Dept of Justice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv01169
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Dept. of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. USA et al
as 1:2021cv00563
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Defendant:
US Attorney General, Dept. of Justice and USA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 1:2019cv02161
Defendant:
U.S. Attorney General, Dept of Justice, Judicial Conference Committee and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Doyle Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
