Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
QUILES v. TICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv01208
Petitioner: Edwin Dolores Quiles
Respondent: Eric Tice, The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
QUILES v. TICE et al
as 2:2021cv03014
Petitioner: EDWIN DOLORES QUILES
Respondent: ERIC TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'NEIL v. ESTOCK et al
as 3:2020cv01210
Respondent: The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania, Superintendent Estock and The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike
Petitioner: Jorge Luis Arroyo O'Neil
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'NEIL v. ESTOCK et al
as 2:2020cv02970
Respondent: ESTOCK, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE
Petitioner: JORGE LUIS ARROYO O'NEIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. TICE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00362
Petitioner: Wayne A. Smith
Respondent: James T. Tice, The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH v. TICE et al
as 2:2016cv00275
Petitioner: WAYNE A. SMITH
Respondent: JAMES T. TICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARINARAIN v. GILMORE et al
as 3:2014cv02395
Petitioner: Cameron A. Harinarain
Respondent: Robert Gilmore, The District Attorney Of The County Of Pike and The Attorney General Of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
HARINARAIN v. GILMORE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06791
Petitioner: CAMERON A. HARINARAIN
Respondent: ROBERT GILMORE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COSENTINO v. ROZUM et al
as 2:2012cv06917
Petitioner: PAUL COSENTINO
Respondent: ROZUM, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PIKE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jennifer Spearman v. Rhonda Winstead, et al
as 12-2657
Plaintiff - Appellant: JENNIFER SPEARMAN
Defendant - Appellee: RHONDA A. WINSTEAD, Superintendent, SCI Cambridge Springs, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PIKE COUNTY, District Attorney for the County of Pike and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?