Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Wilder v. Securus Technologies/JPay et al
as 4:2026cv00921
Plaintiff:
Raynard-Deanco Wilder
Defendant:
Securus Technologies/JPay, United States Person, The Earth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY et al v. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS et al
as 1:2026cv02571
Plaintiff:
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY, SIERRA CLUB, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH U.S. and others
Defendant:
U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS and WILLIAM H. GRAHAM, JR.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
HEALTHY GULF et al v. BURGUM et al
as 1:2026cv02150
Plaintiff:
HEALTHY GULF, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH, CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY and others
Defendant:
DOUG BURGUM, MATTHEW GIACONA, DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Judicial Review of Agency Decision
Helmann, et al. v. Palestinian Youth Movement, et al.
as 26-3604
Plaintiff:
RONEN HELMANN, on behalf of all others similarly situated, and,, JUDIT MAULL and CAMERON HIGBY
Defendant:
PALESTINIAN YOUTH MOVEMENT, CODEPINK: WOMEN FOR PEACE, a California entity, COURTNEY LENNA SCHIRF and others
National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
as 26-2232
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, TROUT UNLIMITED, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OREGON, SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, COEUR D ' ALENE TRIBE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEZ PERCE TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
as 26-2240
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, TROUT UNLIMITED, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OREGON, SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, COEUR D ' ALENE TRIBE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEZ PERCE TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
as 26-2139
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, TROUT UNLIMITED, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OREGON, SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, COEUR D ' ALENE TRIBE and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEZ PERCE TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
HEALTHY GULF et al v. BURGUM et al
as 1:2026cv01118
Plaintiff:
HEALTHY GULF, SIERRA CLUB, FRIENDS OF THE EARTH and others
Defendant:
DOUG BURGUM, PETE HEGSETH, BROOKE ROLLINS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. United States Bureau of Reclamation, et al.
as 26-1997
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, TROUT UNLIMITED, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OREGON, SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, INLAND PORTS AND NAVIGATION GROUP and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
NEZ PERCE TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON and CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF THE YAKAMA NATION
National Wildlife Federation, et al. v. National Marine Fisheries Service, et al.
as 26-1899
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION, AMERICAN RIVERS, INC, TROUT UNLIMITED and others
Intervenor:
STATE OF OREGON, SPOKANE TRIBE OF INDIANS, FRANKLIN COUNTY FARM BUREAU and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF RECLAMATION, UNITED STATES FISH & WILDLIFE SERVICE and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL RURAL ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE ASSOCIATION, NEZ PERCE TRIBE, STATE OF WASHINGTON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.