Cases 41 - 50 of 653
Sherry Dow v. Debbie Stabenow, et al
as 21-5005
Defendant / Appellee:
Fairchild Airforce Base, Central Intelligence Agency, United Nations and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Sherry Lynn Dow
Chinese Voice of the Golden v. FCC, et al
as 20-1514
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
Chinese Voice of the Golden City
Northstar Wireless, LLC, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1508
Petitioner:
Northstar Wireless, LLC and SNR Wireless LicenseCo, LLC
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Northstar Wireless, LLC, et al v. FCC
as 20-1507
Appellant:
Northstar Wireless, LLC and SNR Wireless Licenseco, LLC
Appellee:
Federal Communications Commission
HENRY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2020cv03689
Defendant:
KWAME RAOUL, KLEIN,THORPE AND JENKINS, DENNIS WALSH and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Inteliquent, Inc. v. FCC, et al
as 20-1471
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Petitioner:
Inteliquent, Inc.
DOW v. STABENOW et al
as 1:2020cv02486
Defendant:
HEADQUARTERS U.S. AIR FORCE WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE, UNIVERSAL STUDIOS, COMCAST, MOODY AIR FORCE BASE and others
Plaintiff:
SHERRY LYNN DOW
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
City of Boston, Massachusetts, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1301
Petitioner:
City of Piedmont, California, Howard County, Maryland, City of Gaithersburg, Maryland and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
City of Seattle, Washington, et al v. FCC, et al
as 20-1300
Petitioner:
City of Concord, California, City of Napa, California, City of Richmond, California and others
Respondent:
United States of America and Federal Communications Commission
Michael Karr v. FCC, et al
as 20-1288
Petitioner:
Michael Karr, d/b/a WVUX-LD
Respondent:
Federal Communications Commission
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
