Cases 21 - 25 of 25
City Lights Electrical Co., Inc. v. Suffolk Construction Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv10895
Plaintiff:
The United States of America
Defendant:
Suffolk Construction Co., Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
N.B. Kenney Co., Inc. v Suffolk Construction Company et al
as 1:2010cv10659
Plaintiff:
N.B. Kenney Co., Inc.
Defendant:
Suffolk Construction Co., Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 270
United States of America v. Suffolk Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv10531
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Suffolk Construction Company, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
United States for the Use and Benefit of Yankee Technology, Inc. et al v. Pinnacle Piping and Service Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv10371
Plaintiff:
United States for the Use and Benefit of Yankee Technology, Inc. and Yankee Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
Pinnacle Piping and Service Corporation and Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
ADP Marshall, Inc. v. NORESCO, LLC et al
as 1:2007cv00129
Plaintiff:
ADP Marshall, Inc
Defendant:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, Lumbermen's Mutual Casualty Company and others
ThirdParty Defendant:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company
Counter Defendant:
ADP Marshall, Inc and ADP Marshall, Inc
ThirdParty Plaintiff:
NORESCO, LLC, NORESCO, LLC, Lumbermans Mutual Casualty Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
