Other Statutes Cases
Cases 31 - 40 of 86
Ronell Nichols v. Loppe, et al
as 20-3330
Defendant / Appellee: DEPUTY WARDEN MARIO COLUCCI, CORRECTIONAL OFFICER BOYD, Guard, GEO GROUP INC and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONELL NICHOLS
The Geo Group, Inc., et al v. Gavin Newsom, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-56172
Defendant / Appellee: GAVIN NEWSOM, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of California and XAVIER BECERRA, in his official capacity as Attorney General of the State of California
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Plaintiff / Appellant: THE GEO GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: MANAGEMENT & TRAINING CORPORATION
Stephen Mayer v. T. Johns, et al
as 20-13599
Petitioner / Appellant: STEPHEN MEYER and STEPHEN MAYER
Respondent / Appellee: THE GEO GROUP, INC., T. JOHNS, Facility Manager and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Angel Zepeda Rivas, et al v. David Jennings, et al
as 20-16690
Defendant / Appellant: DAVID JENNINGS, Acting Field Officer Director, MATTHEW T. ALBENCE, Deputy Director and IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellee: DUNG TUAN DANG, ANGEL DE JESUS ZEPEDA RIVAS, CORAIMA YARITZA SANCHEZ NUNEZ and others
Defendant: NATHAN ALLEN, Warden and GEO GROUP, INC.
Immigrant Legal Resources Cent, et al v. City of McFarland, et al
as 20-16580
Respondent: CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Not Classified By Court: GEO GROUP, INC.
Petitioner: IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae: LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Ctr., et al v. Geo Group, Inc., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-16557
Respondent: CITY OF MCFARLAND PLANNING COMMISSION and CITY OF MCFARLAND
Petitioner: IMMIGRANT LEGAL RESOURCES CENTER and FREEDOM FOR IMMIGRANTS, Attorney General
Appellant: GEO GROUP, INC.
Intervenor: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Amicus Curiae: LAWYERS COMMITTEE FOR CIVIL RIGHTS OF THE SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA, SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, ACLU OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA, AND ACLU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, HUMAN IMPACT PARTNERS, DR. PARVEEN PARMAR, AND DR. WILLIAM MARTINEZ, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Codner, et al v. Choate, et al
as 20-1265
Plaintiff: NAOMI LESTHER RAFAEL HERNANDEZ MORALES, ALISON (MELVIN) MENDOZA MENDOZA, BRITANY (JOSE ANTOINIO) RIVIERA CALERO and others
Defendant / Appellee: IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT, JOHNNY CHOATE, in his official capacity as warden of the Aurora Contract Detention Facility owned and operated by Geo Group Inc., JOHN FABBRICATORE, in his official capacity as Denver ICE ERO Acting Field Office Director and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: NDI WILFRED TEMAH, MADELINE (FLAVIO) TATIS BELLIARD, SANELA HAMZIC and others
Immigrant Legal Resources Center et al v. City of McFarland et al
as 1:2020at00489
Petitioner: Immigrant Legal Resources Center and Freedom For Immigrants
Respondent: City of McFarland and City of McFarland Planning Commission
3Rd Party Defendant: Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Immigrant Legal Resources Center et al v. City of McFarland et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00966
Petitioner: Immigrant Legal Resources Center and Freedom For Immigrants
Respondent: City of McFarland and City of McFarland Planning Commission
3Rd Party Defendant: Geo Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Hartel v. The GEO Group, Inc. et al
as 9:2020cv81063
Plaintiff: Steve Hartel
Defendant: George C. Zoley, Brian R. Evans and The GEO Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0078

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?