Cases 1 - 5 of 5
United States OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF INSULATION CONTRACTING SERVICES, INC. v. MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00883
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF INSULATION CONTRACTING SERVICES, INCORPORATED
Defendant:
MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC and THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NYCOM, INC. v. MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00565
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF NYCOM, INC.
Defendant:
MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC and THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF SBS/MARTIN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, LLC, a division of THE COOK & BOARDMAN GROUP, LLC v. MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00374
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF SBS/MARTIN ARCHITECTURAL PRODUCTS, LLC, a division of THE COOK & BOARDMAN GROUP, LLC
Defendant:
MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC and THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR THE USE AND BENEFIT OF ARM ELECTRIC, LLC v. MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC et al
as 1:2014cv00189
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR USE AND BENEFIT OF ARM ELECTRIC, LLC
Defendant:
MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC and THE GUARANTEE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA USA
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP. v. A UNIQUE DRYWALL, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2011cv01155
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP.
Defendant:
A UNIQUE DRYWALL, L.L.C. , ERICK AGUILAR RUIZ , MAVCON SERVICES OF MI, LLC and others
Counter_claimant:
A UNIQUE DRYWALL, L.L.C. and ERICK AGUILAR RUIZ
Counter_defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FOR THE USE OF ALLIED BUILDING PRODUCTS CORP.
Cause Of Action: 40 U.S.C. § 3131
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
