Cases 1 - 10 of 105
Stourbridge Investments LLC v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00734
Plaintiff:
Stourbridge Investments LLC
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, Frank D. Yeary, David Zinsner and others
Ly v. Gelsinger et al
as 1:2024cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Ly
Defendant:
Pat Gelsinger, David Zinsner, James Goetz and others
Ayers v. iRhythm Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Defendant:
Quentin Blackford, Bruce G. Bodaken, Karen Ling and others
Muhammad v. Mason
as 1:2024cv00529
Petitioner:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad, King Walid Abdullah Muhammad and Waliyd Muhammad
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
O'Neill v. ZeroFox Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00470
Plaintiff:
Shannon O'Neill
Defendant:
ZeroFox Holdings, Inc., James C. Foster, Todd P. Headley and others
Thomas v. White et al
as 1:2023cv01217
Plaintiff:
Devin Thomas
Defendant:
Trooper First Class Trevor White, Sergeant Jon King and Corporal Brandon Triantos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Novo Nordisk Inc. et al v. Meitheal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv01195
Plaintiff:
Novo Nordisk Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S
Defendant:
Meitheal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Nanjing King-Friend Biochemical Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Powell et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2023cv00698
Plaintiff:
Shavortis Powell, Emery Day, Jessica Knoke and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
King of Sweets Online, Inc. v. Kervan USA, LLC
as 1:2023cv00605
Plaintiff:
King of Sweets Online, Inc.
Defendant:
Kervan USA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Johnson v. Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
Satsuma Pharmaceuticals, Inc., John Kollins, Heath Lukatch and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
