Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04836
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Marano v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 1:2019cv08606
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Marano
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Arnett v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2019cv04072
Plaintiff:
Cazal Arnett
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art and The Costume Institute, The Metropolitan Musuem of Art
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv10128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Cenedella v. Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2018cv01029
Plaintiff:
Robert Cenedella
Defendant:
Metropolitan Museum of Art , Whitney Museum of American Art , Museum of Modern Art and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00967
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Smith v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2016cv07750
Plaintiff:
James D. Smith
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art , John and Jane Does 1-10 and XYZ Corp. 1-20
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 184
Zuckerman v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 1:2016cv07665
Plaintiff:
Laurel Zuckerman
Defendant:
The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James et al v. The Metropolitan Museum Of Art
as 1:2016mc00058
Petitioner:
Charles B.H. James and Louise D.B. James
Respondent:
The Metropolitan Museum Of Art
Cause Of Action: M 18-304 Administrative Subpoena Proceedings
Joseph v. Metropolitan Museum of Art et al
as 1:2015cv09358
Plaintiff:
Justin Renel Joseph
Defendant:
Metropolitan Museum of Art and City Of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
