Cases 71 - 80 of 504
Thorpe v. People of the State of New York
as 9:2020cv00444
Petitioner:
Shawn Thorpe
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Inesti v. People of the State of New York
as 1:2020cv01753
Petitioner:
Mark Inesti
Respondent:
People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Russell v.New York State Division of Parole
as 9:2020cv00313
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York, State Parole and New York State Division of Parole
Petitioner:
Da'Shawn L. Russell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. The People of The State of New York
as 6:2020cv06170
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
David A. Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Feliz v. Park et al
as 1:2020cv02014
Defendant:
Abraham Clott, Charles Solomon, Jung Park and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Feliz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hicks v. The People of The State of New York
as 1:2020cv01486
Respondent:
The People of The State of New York
Petitioner:
Jamal Hicks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Montes v. James
as 9:2020cv00150
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Petitioner:
Germaine Montes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Barnes v. The People Of The State Of New York
as 1:2020cv00516
Respondent:
The People Of The State Of New York
Petitioner:
Gregory Barnes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Strong v. The People of the State of New York
as 1:2020cv00045
Petitioner:
Terrance L. Strong
Respondent:
The People of the State of New York
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
FELIZ v. PARK et al
as 1:2019cv03861
Defendant:
ABRAHAM CLOTT, JUNG PARK, PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER FELIZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
