Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Darren Eisenlord v. The Quaker Oats Company et al
as 2:2016cv01442
Defendant:
Does and The Quaker Oats Company
Plaintiff:
Darren Eisenlord
Elyse Mirto v. The Quaker Oats Company et al
as 2:2012cv06299
Defendant:
Does and Quaker Oats Company
Plaintiff:
Elyse Mirto
Pelobello v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 3:2011cv00093
Plaintiff:
Elaine Pelobello
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bruno et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 5:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bruno and Rebecca Yumul
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruno et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 4:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bruno and Rebecca Yumul
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bruno et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 3:2010cv05538
Plaintiff:
Kelly Bruno and Rebecca Yumul
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chacanaca et al v. The Quaker Oats Company
as 5:2010cv00502
Plaintiff:
Robert Chacanaca, Robert Chacanaca, Victor Guttmann and others
Defendant:
The Quaker Oats Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Neil Schultz v. iGPS Inc et al
as 2:2009cv06692
Plaintiff:
Neil Schultz and Neil Schultz
Defendant:
iGPS Inc, California Giant Cooling LLC, Salyer American Fresh Foods Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McMaster v. Quaker Oats Company, et al
as 2:2007cv01920
Petitioner:
Lorreli McMaster
Defendant:
Quaker Oats Company, Quaker Oats Company Long Term Disability Plan and Life Insurance Company of North America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Quaker Oats Company v. Nadajafinia, et al
as 2:2007cv01409
Plaintiff:
Quaker Oats Company, Quaker Oats Company and Quaker Oats Company
Defendant:
Heidi Nadajafinia and John Doe Nadajafinia
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
