Cases 1 - 8 of 8
BUTLER v. THE HOME DEPOT, INC. et al
as 5:2017cv04944
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BUTLER
Defendant:
THE HOME DEPOT, INC., THE RAYMOND CORPORATION and EXCEL CONTRACTING, SHIPPING AND RECEIVING SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SOLA v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
as 5:2016cv01728
Plaintiff:
JAMES C. SOLA
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WALLACE v. ARBOR MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv04282
Plaintiff:
KEITH WALLACE
Defendant:
ARBOR MATERIAL HANDLING, INC. , ARBOR HANDLING SERVICES, INC. , ARBOR HANDLING SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOGAN v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv00846
Plaintiff:
PERCY HOGAN, JR.
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION and GIANT EAGLE INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TROTTER et al v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv02818
Plaintiff:
JAMES TROTTER and LORI TROTTER
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION , RAYMOND INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT LIMITED , TOYOTA INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
GLIELMI v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
as 1:2009cv05734
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY GLIELMI
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE, INC. v. THE RAYMOND CORPORATION et al
as 2:2008cv05402
Plaintiff:
NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE, INC.
Defendant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION, RAYMOND LEASING CORPORATION, RAYMOND OF NEW JERSEY, LLC and others
Counter Claimant:
THE RAYMOND CORPORATION and RAYMOND LEASING CORPORATION
Counter Defendant:
NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE, INC. and NEWARK REFRIGERATED WAREHOUSE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
PLUNKETT et al v. RAYMOND CORPORATION et al
as 5:2008cv02599
Plaintiff:
DANIEL C. PLUNKETT and KIM PLUNKETT
Defendant:
RAYMOND CORPORATION, HIGH CONSTRUCTION, INC. and FOUR SEASONS PRODUCE, INC.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
