Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Vorce v. State of Colorado and others
as 2:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Rickie L Vorce and Rick Vorce
Defendant:
State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00015
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00011
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00016
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of Kansas, State of Wisconsin and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 1901 Indian Child Welfare Act
Diale v. State of Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00014
Plaintiff:
Amber Marie Diale
Defendant:
State of Virginia, State of North Carolina, State of Michigan and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Curcio v. CCS Medical Inc et al
as 3:2023cv01579
Plaintiff:
Frederick D Curcio, IV, United States of America, State of California and others
Defendant:
CCS Medical Inc, DEGC Enterprises (US) Inc, Highland Capital Management LP and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3730 Qui Tam False Claims Act
Fund Texas Choice et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2022cv00859
Plaintiff:
Fund Texas Choice, The North Texas Equal Access Fund, The Lilith Fund for Reproductive Equity and others
Defendant:
Ken Paxton, Susan R. Deski, Julie Renken and others
Amicus Curiae:
Physicians For Reproductive Health, State of California, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
