Cases 21 - 30 of 4,295
Commonwealth of Kentucky, et al v. EPA, et al
as 24-1087
Petitioner:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, State of West Virginia, State of Alabama and others
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency and Michael S. Regan, in his official capacity as Administrator of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
MARTIN v. CHAMBERS
as 3:2024cv00032
Petitioner:
JOHN WILLIAM MARTIN
Respondent:
BRIAN CHAMBERS
Other:
ATTORNEY GENERAL STATE OF GEORGIA (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry v. Fitz
as 2:2024cv02242
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Henry
Respondent:
Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Martin v. Chambers
as 3:2024cv00028
Petitioner:
John William Martin
Respondent:
Warden Brian Chambers
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Terrance DentIn re: Terrance Dent
as 24-11179
Petitioner:
In re: TERRANCE JUSTIN DENT
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA
Evans v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv00045
Petitioner:
Quint Lavert Evans
Respondent:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Sifuenter v. State of Georgia
as 5:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Gerardo Roel Sifuentes
Defendant:
State of Georgia and Odum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2024cv02906
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
The Mark Atlanta Georgia and State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pittman v. State of Georgia
as 1:2024cv02892
Plaintiff:
Nadira A. Pittman
Defendant:
State of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01591
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
