Cases filed in California
Cases 21 - 30 of 46
State of California et al v. U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00682
Defendant: Seema Verma, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and others
Plaintiff: State of California, District of Columbia, State of Colorado and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
State of California et al v. Bernhardt et al
as 4:2019cv06013
Plaintiff: State of North Carolina, State of Nevada, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: National Marine Fisheries Service, United States Fish And Wildlife Service, Wilbur Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Kevin K. McAleenan
as 2:2019cv07390
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, Commonwealth of Virginia and others
Defendant: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Alex M. Azar, II, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae: Save the Children Federation, Inc., American Medical Association, First Focus on Children and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Alabama et al v. Endo International PLC, et al
as 3:2019cv04157
Plaintiff: State of Arkansas, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceutical Inc., Endo international PLC. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337
State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03807
Plaintiff: District of Columbia, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant: Andrew Wheeler and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 30 U.S.C. § 1201
State of California et al v. United States Environmental Protection Agency et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv03237
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Illinois , State of Maryland and others
Defendant: United States Environmental Protection Agency and E. Scott Pruitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
In Re Dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM) Antitrust Litigation
as 4:2002md01486
Plaintiff: Oracle America, Inc., Petro Computer Systems, Inc., Ashley Pritchett and others
Intervenor: Maurice Shelly, Daniel Anthony Weymouth, Patrick J. Simpson and others
Not Classified By Court: norman d palmer, Norman D. Palmer, Bryan Marcus and others
Defendant: Korea Development Bank, Hyundai Heavy Industries, Co., Ltd., NEC Electronics Corporation and others
Petitioner: Unisys Corporation, JACO Electronics, Inc, All American Semiconductor Inc. and others
Not Yet Classified: Charter Township of Clinton Police & Fire Retirement System, Chemical Valley Pension Fund of West Virginia, Kimball Electronics Tampa, Inc. FKA Reptron Electronics, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Celestica Corporation
Special Master: Charles B. Renfrew
Claimant: Oak Point Partners, Inc.
Respondent: Chip-Tech, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00675
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Alabama , State of Arkansas and others
Defendant: Teikoku Seiyaku Co., Ltd. and Teikoku Pharma USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
State of California et al v. Pruitt et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv06936
Plaintiff: State of California , State of New York , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant: E. Scott Pruitt and United States Environmental Protection Agency
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7413
California v. Trump We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2017cv05895
Plaintiff: State of California , State of Connecticut , State of Delaware and others
Defendant: Donald J. Trump
Amicu: Americas Health Insurance Plans , Nancy Pelosi , Steny H. Hoyer and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?