Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ROJAS et al v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 1:2023cv03140
Plaintiff:
EDWIN L. ROJAS and PLAN B NETWORK SERVICES, INC.
Defendant:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT, STATE OF TEXAS, STATE OF CALIFORNIA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FAKEYE v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2018cv00705
Plaintiff:
DOTUN FAKEYE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, CIA, UNITES STATES POLICE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DURU v. MITCHELL et al
as 1:2017cv00927
Defendant:
FELICIA PITRE, U.S. CIVIL CASE ADMINISTRATORS, KERRY KOHNEN and others
Plaintiff:
ROSE ADANMA DURU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
HAMILTON, II v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00185
Plaintiff:
LOUIS CHARLES HAMILTON, II
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TEXAS, HARRIS COUNTY TEXAS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00976
Petitioner:
SAMUEL JAMES JACKSON
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, STATE OF TEXAS, TIME WARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. JINDAL et al
as 1:2010cv01052
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
BOBBY JINDAL, STATE OF LOUISIANA, SUE P. EVERHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STRUNK v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS et al
as 1:2009cv01295
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER EARL STRUNK
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE BUREAU OF THE CENSUS, CARLOS GUTIERREZ, CITY OF NEW YORK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv00378
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
CRAWFORD v. THE STATE OF TEXAS
as 1:2007cv01104
Plaintiff:
HATTIE JEAN MORGAN CRAWFORD
Defendant:
THE STATE OF TEXAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
