Cases 1 - 10 of 2,677
Busby v. State of Texas
as 3:2024cv01099
Petitioner:
Wyatt Busby
Respondent:
State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kindred v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2024cv00237
Plaintiff:
Herman Kindred
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Erik K. White, The State of Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Padilla v. 203rd Judicial District Courts et al
as 3:2024cv01100
Plaintiff:
Ismael Padilla
Defendant:
203rd Judicial District Courts, US District Court, Fifth Cir Ct of Appeals and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greer v. State of Texas
as 24-20190
Plaintiff:
Dennis W. Greer, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Texas and its Agents and Harris County Sheriff's Department and its Agents
Krikie v. State of Texas et al
as 3:2024cv01054
Petitioner:
David Paul Krikie
Respondent:
State of Texas and Dallas County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-10381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40305
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40306
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40308
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Garcia v. Lumpkin
as 24-40309
Plaintiff:
Antonio A. Garcia
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division and State of Texas
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
