Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Daugherty v. KY State Penitentiary et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
William J. Daugherty
Defendant:
KY State Penitentiary and Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Forte v. North Point Training Center et al
as 5:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
Montrail Forte
Defendant:
North Point Training Center, The State of Kentucky, Officer Chad Shearer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reynolds v. Northpoint Training Center
as 5:2015cv00142
Plaintiff:
Jason Reynolds
Defendant:
Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reynolds v. Northpoint Training Center
as 3:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Jason Reynolds
Defendant:
Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allman v. Kentucky Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2014cv00424
Petitioner:
Teddy Albert Allman
Respondent:
Kentucky Department of Corrections, Northpoint Training Center Legal Services Library and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00200
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Gamble v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 5:2014cv00187
Petitioner:
Bennie L. Gamble, Jr.
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Kentucky, McCracken County Circuit Court, Kentucky Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Trumbo v. Northpoint Training Center
as 5:2013cv00275
Petitioner:
Derek Russell Trumbo, Sr.
Respondent:
Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Swan v. Bottom et al
as 3:2012cv00826
Plaintiff:
Marcus Swan
Defendant:
Don Bottom and Northpoint Training Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
