Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Coslow v. Footprint Acquisition LLC et al
as 2:2025cv10455
Plaintiff:
P.R. Abigail Coslow
Defendant:
Footprint Acquisition LLC and Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Thanasi v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company, et al.
as 2:2023cv10849
Plaintiff:
Arjanit Thanasi
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Travelers Insurance Company and Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Miller v. Cintas Corporation et al
as 1:2020cv00577
Defendant:
Franklin Kuespert, The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut, Cintas Service Transportation, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Old Republic Insurance Company et al

as 1:2019cv00653
Defendant:
VPSI Titling Company, Sedgwick Claims Management, Old Republic General Insurance Company and others
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company v. The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut et al

as 2:2016cv11767
Plaintiff:
Michigan Millers Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
The Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut and Emcasco Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Asphalt Specialists, Inc. v. Travelers Indemnity Company et al CASE TRANSFERRED

as 2:2010cv12291
Plaintiff:
Asphalt Specialists, Inc.
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company , Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut , Travelers Property Casualty Company of America and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seleno v. Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
as 5:2007cv14466
Plaintiff:
Richard Seleno
Defendant:
Travelers Indemnity Company of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.