Cases 31 - 40 of 115
COBBLE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, U S GOVERNMENT and SUMTER COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS JUDGES et al
as 1:2017cv00006
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS JUDGES, GEORGIA COUNTY MAGISTRATE JUDGES, GEORGIA SUPREME COURT JUDGES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2017cv00007
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and U S GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT
as 1:2017cv00010
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
U S GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2017cv00004
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
U S GOVERNMENT, STATE GOVERNMENT and COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
COBBLE v. NEELEY et al
as 1:2016cv00235
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
ROBERT R NEELEY, ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, JENNIFER WARREN PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COBBLE v. U S GOVERNMENT et al
as 5:2016cv00486
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
U S GOVERNMENT, GEORGIA STATE OF, STEPHANIE ANNE LOCKHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COBBLE v. OWENS et al
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
BRIAN OWENS, U S GOVERNMENT and PETE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cobble v. U. S. Government et al
as 1:2016cv03537
Petitioner:
Daniel Eric Cobble
Respondent:
U. S. Government, Brian Owens, Pete Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
COBBLE v. CHASTEEN et al
as 1:2016cv00156
Plaintiff:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Defendant:
ROBERT CHASTEEN, GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS, U S GOVERNMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
