Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ruiz v. U S Government
as 5:2023cv00106
Petitioner:
Rafael Verdejo Ruiz
Respondent:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2021cv00802
Defendant:
Department of Justice U S Government, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Department of Homeland Security and U.S. Customs & Border Protection and others
Plaintiff:
Incorrectly Filed
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888
Brown v. U S Government et al
as 6:2013cv00382
Plaintiff:
Marc Anthony Brown
Defendant:
U S Government and U S Department of Treasury
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mills v. U. S. Government et al
as 3:2011cv01428
Plaintiff:
Wendal Mills
Defendant:
U. S. Government and Walmart Stores
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Britton v. U S Government
as 6:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Robert G Britton
Defendant:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Phillips v. U S Government
as 6:2010cv00299
Plaintiff:
Daniel Edward Phillips
Defendant:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Resendez v. Justice et al
as 1:2009cv00165
Petitioner:
Ricardo Resendez
Respondent:
FNU Justice, U.S. Attorney General and U. S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Roy v. U S Government
as 5:2009cv00116
Plaintiff:
Karnal Karna Roy
Defendant:
U S Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. U. S. Government et al
as 6:2009cv00125
Plaintiff:
David Reynolds
Defendant:
U. S. Government and Bureau Of Prisons
Cause Of Action: Bivens
Herrera-Isais v. U S Government et al
as 4:2009cv01549
Petitioner:
Rogelio Herrera-Isais
Respondent:
U S Government, U S Attorney General and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
