Cases 1 - 10 of 17
James v. U.S. Government's David Burke
as 1:2022cv04333
Plaintiff:
Bill James
Defendant:
U.S. Government's David Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
James v. U.S. Government's et al
as 1:2022cv04183
Plaintiff:
Bill James
Defendant:
U.S. Government's, Unknown "Pro Se Clerk #1" and Unknown Clerk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Roby v. U.S. Government
as 1:2021cv03959
Plaintiff:
Alfred H. Roby
Defendant:
U.S. Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Whitted v. U.S. Army et al
as 1:2019cv06914
Defendant:
U.S. Army and U.S. Government
Plaintiff:
Michael Whitted
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
U.S. Government et al v. Nola Devries et al
as 3:2019cv00972
Plaintiff:
Veterans Administration, Frank T. Pearson, U.S. Government and others
Defendant:
Tom Dooley, Norm Brand, Forreston Mutual Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hadley v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals PLC et al
as 3:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
Leonard Hadley
Defendant:
Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals PLC, Astrazeneca PLC and U.S. Government Food and Drug Adminstration
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Worthen v. Illinois Department of Revenue et al
as 1:2017cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gerald Joseph Worthen
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Revenue, Lake County Circuit Court Clerk Office, Lake County Recorder of Deeds and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Bealer v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2016cv01496
Plaintiff:
Antonio Bealer
Defendant:
U.S. Government et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Veal v. U.S. Government and Citizens
as 1:2016cv11422
Plaintiff:
Tonnia Veal
Defendant:
U.S. Government and Citizens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charem v. U.S. Government et al
as 1:2014cv02479
Plaintiff:
Khalil Charem
Defendant:
U.S. Government, U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
