Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lippert-Rizzo v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00349
Plaintiff:
Marcella Lippert-Rizzo
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and Gary W. Maurice
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Davis v. United States of America et al
as 1:2016cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tony Davis
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Postal Service and James D. Lauve
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Peavy v. United States Postal Service
as 3:2015cv00545
Plaintiff:
Tracii Peavy
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Gonzales v. Donahoe et al
as 1:2014cv00259
Plaintiff:
Joseph Gonzales
Defendant:
Patrick Donahoe and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2014cv00493
Plaintiff:
Angela D. Lewis and Jaleah Lewis
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, United States and William D. McCary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mississippi Transportation Commission v. Trinity Postal, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv00031
Plaintiff:
Mississippi Transportation Commission
Defendant:
Trinity Postal, Inc., Capital Lease Funding, LLC., Danny L. Crotwell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dawson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00473
Plaintiff:
James B. Dawson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. United States Postal Service et al
as 3:2013cv00404
Plaintiff:
James B. Dawson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service and Patrick R. Donahoe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
