Cases 1 - 10 of 552
Washington v. LeMaster
as 0:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Brian Jermaine Washington
Respondent:
Warden David LeMaster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Khan v. Paul
as 5:2024cv00243
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Plaintiff:
Omar Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henny v Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00239
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Ann Henny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Knutson v. Levitt/Gilley et al
as 6:2024cv00095
Respondent:
A-3 Unit Manager Lewis, J. Gilley, SiS Lt. Smith and others
Petitioner:
Todd Seaver Knutson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stice v. Green et al
as 0:2024cv00083
Defendant:
Warden Green, Warden McKenzie, Warden Roederer Correctional Complex and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Stice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Browning v. United States of America et al
as 3:2024cv00469
Defendant:
David Gabbard, Warden John Gilley, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Browning
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henson v. Warden USP McCreary
as 6:2024cv00117
Petitioner:
Steven Henson
Respondent:
Warden USP McCreary
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Matthews v. Paul, Warden et al
as 5:2024cv00192
Defendant:
Michael Broughton, Greg Gilbert, Timothy Terrell and others
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Matthews and Jermaine Izell Maurice McMatthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dunnaway v. Mazza
as 5:2024cv00209
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Petitioner:
Deqontay Dunnaway
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pride v. Paul, et al
as 5:2024cv00204
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden and Bureau of Prisons
Petitioner:
Andrae Pride
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
