Cases 1 - 10 of 3,673
Ramirez v. Warden, FCI Big Spring
as 1:2024cv00155
Defendant:
Warden, FCI Big Spring
Petitioner:
Armando Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Westbrook v. Collier et al
as 7:2024cv00125
Defendant:
CGO Administrator Jessica Riley, CO Francine Cromer, Senior Warden Jennifer S Cozby and others
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey D. Westbrook
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv01060
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Davis v. UCC et al
as 4:2024cv03515
Defendant:
STG/G.I/OIG, TDCJ, UCC and others
Plaintiff:
Terry Matthew Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anduha v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03466
Respondent:
Warden Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Marlene Anduha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Curl v. Warden Rule et al
as 4:2024cv00880
Respondent:
Warden Rule, Ms. Washington and Mr. Cantrell
Petitioner:
Sandra Denise Curl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Tyson v. Hall
as 4:2024cv02818
Respondent:
Warden Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Wyvonne Tyson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Berrios-Osorto v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00377
Petitioner:
Olvyn Abilo Berrios-Osorto
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Miller v. Johnston
as 5:2024cv00139
Respondent:
Warden J Johnston
Petitioner:
Daniel Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Bustos-Cruz v. Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
as 1:2024cv00378
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Beaumont Low
Petitioner:
Sergio Antonio Bustos-Cruz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
