Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Talarczyk et al v. Air & Liquid Systems Corporation et al
as 8:2022cv00836
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS TALARCZYK and WANDA ALGARIN TALARCZYK
Defendant:
Air & Liquid Systems Corporation, ALFA LAVAL INC., THE DELAVAL SEPARATOR COMPANY and others
Not Classified By Court:
Jonathan C. Hollinshead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Baker et al v. Alfa Laval, Inc. et al
as 8:2013cv00551
Plaintiff:
Ronald Everett Baker and Mae Baker
Defendant:
Alfa Laval, Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. , Aurora Pump Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Crayton et al v. Armstrong International Inc et al
as 3:2011cv03912
Plaintiff:
Clarence Crayton , John K Atkinson , Don Haataja and others
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, A W Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Creasy et al v. Armstrong International, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv03813
Plaintiff:
Lynda M. Creasy , Cecil Owens and Regina D. Parker
Defendant:
Armstrong International, Inc., A.W. Chesterton Company, CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holland et al v. Airco Inc et al
as 5:2011cv02189
Plaintiff:
Owen D Holland and Gregory A Legg
Defendant:
Armstrong International Inc, A W Chesterton Company , CBS Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Thurmon et al v. Georgia Pacific, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mike Thurmon , Mary K. Thurmon , Helen Johnson and others
Defendant:
Georgia Pacific, LLC, A.W. Chesterton, Inc. , Bayer Cropscience, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Reaser et al v. A.W. Chesterton Co. et al
as 8:2008cv01323
Plaintiff:
Robert Reaser, Robert Reaser, Robert Reaser and others
Defendant:
A.W. Chesterton Co., Afton Pumps, Inc., Alfa Laval, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
