Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Theo Jones v. City of Oakland
as 23-15340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
THEO CEDAR JONES
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Jones v. City of Oakland
as 3:2023cv00166
Plaintiff:
Theo Cedar Jones
Defendant:
City of Oakland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blain et al v. California Department of Transportation et al
as 3:2022cv04178
Plaintiff:
Jackson Blain, John Janosko, Kellie Castillo and others
Defendant:
Governor Gavin Newsom, County of Alameda, California Department of Transportation, Toks Omishakin, Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Newsom et al
as 3:2022cv03996
Plaintiff:
Theo Cedar Jones
Defendant:
Gov. Gavin Newsome, Toks Omishakin, Dina El-Tawansy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bland v. United States Marshal Service et al
as 2:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
Martell B. Bland
Defendant:
United States Marshal Service, Correction Corporation of America, Core Civic Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Swendseid v. County Of Monterey et al
as 5:2020cv06875
Defendant:
County of Monterey County Of Monterey, Jennifer M. Butz-Tavarez and Todd Keating
Plaintiff:
Theo Herakles Swendseid
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv03502
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Theo Milonopoulos et al v. Janet Napolitano et al
as 2:2014cv09125
Defendant:
Richard Balogun, Gene Block, Terrence Duren and others
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1, Jane Doe 2, Jane Doe 3 and others
Theo Milonopoulos v. Debra Bowen et al
as 2:2014cv05973
Defendant:
Debra Bowen and Dean C. Logan
Movant:
Californians to Defend the Open Primary
Plaintiff:
Theo Milonopoulos
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2011cv00709
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
