Cases 11 - 20 of 23
SOILEAU v. AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
as 2:2010cv40872
Plaintiff:
THEO R SOILEAU
Defendant:
AMERICAN TRADING & PRODUCTION CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
SOILEAU v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2010cv40873
Plaintiff:
THEO R SOILEAU
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv03090
Plaintiff:
RENY MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THEO V. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MORGAN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2010cv02949
Plaintiff:
RENY MORGAN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and THEO SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. A.C. AND S., INC. et al
as 2:2009cv82260
Plaintiff:
THEO WALLACE MANN and ELSA MANN
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC., A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MELVIN v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76407
Plaintiff:
THEO L. MELVIN
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
DAVIS v. 3M et al
as 2:2008cv81561
Defendant:
3M, FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORPORATION, FOSTER WHEELER CONSTRUCTORS INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES THEO DAVIS
Cause Of Action: Diversity
RABB v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64408
Plaintiff:
THEO RABB and THEO RABB
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
COUEY v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64949
Plaintiff:
THEO COUEY and THEO COUEY
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
MCLEMORE v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv66113
Plaintiff:
THEO MCLEMORE and THEO MCLEMORE
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
