Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Pryor v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01346
Plaintiff:
Theo Pryor
Defendant:
Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Women's Health LLC, Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hill v. Hommie et al
as 1:2021cv01303
Plaintiff:
Brian R. Hill
Defendant:
Fulton County Commissioner(s), Theo Jackson and M. Pettie Hommie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00095
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
LEWIS v. BOBBITT
as 3:2018cv00064
Petitioner:
DAVID THEO LEWIS
Undetermined:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Respondent:
Trevonza Bobbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LEWIS v. BOBBITT
as 5:2018cv00308
Petitioner:
DAVID THEO LEWIS
Respondent:
WARDEN TREVONZA BOBBITT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Mollie et al
as 1:2018cv03763
Defendant:
Crowne Sports Grill LLC and Theo K. Mollie
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Acosta v. Mann & Wolldridge, P.C. et al
as 3:2018cv00026
Plaintiff:
R. Alexander Acosta
Defendant:
Mann & Wooldridge, P.C. , Theo D. Mann , R. Brian Wooldridge and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
LEWIS v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2017cv00201
Plaintiff:
DAVID THEO LEWIS
Defendant:
STATE OF GEORGIA, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SHAY HATCHER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Doll House II, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv00053
Plaintiff:
Brandy Mizner-Klearman and Suzette Q. Maxey
Defendant:
Doll House II, Inc. and Theo Lambros
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Carter v. Doll House II, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Lashaun Y. Carter
Defendant:
Doll House II, Inc. and Theo Lambros
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 216
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
