Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Christian v. Amerson et al
as 1:2016cv00330
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Larry Amerson, Eric Starr, Whiteside and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Campbell et al
as 1:2010cv02638
Plaintiff:
Theron L. Christian
Defendant:
Barbara Campbell, Lynde Green and Calhoun County Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christian v. Garlick et al
as 1:2010cv01677
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Autumn Garlick, Calhoun County Jail, Calhoun County Commissioner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Theron Christian v. Barbara Campbell
as 10-12472
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THERON L. CHRISTIAN
Defendant - Appellee:
BARBARA CAMPBELL
Christian v. Garlick et al
as 1:2010cv00334
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Autumn Garlick and Felicia Owens
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Campbell
as 1:2009cv02351
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Barbara Campbell
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Calhoun County Jail et al
as 1:2009cv01721
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail and Cobb
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Calhoun County Jail et al
as 1:2009cv01131
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Calhoun County Jail, Sykes, Crossley and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Stemen et al
as 1:2009cv00888
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Rocky Stemen and Sheila Feazell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Christian v. Hooks et al
as 1:2007cv01896
Plaintiff:
Theron L Christian
Defendant:
Ted Hooks, Brian Scott, Anniston Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
