Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Emm v. Yerington Paiute Tribe et al
as 3:2017cv00614
Plaintiff:
Johanna Emm
Defendant:
Wayne M. Garcia, Linda L. Howard, David E. Humke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BP America Inc. et al v. Yerington Paiute Tribe et al
as 3:2017cv00588
Plaintiff:
Atlantic Richfield Company and BP America Inc.
Defendant:
Sandra-Mae Pickens, Laurie A. Thom, Yerington Paiute Tribal Court and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. v. Metal Recovery Solutions, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00563
Plaintiff:
Geo-Logic Associates, Inc.
Defendant:
Metal Recovery Solutions, Inc. and Thom Seal
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1836 (b) Civil Action to Protect Trade Secrets
Moonin et al v. State of Nevada Department of Public Safety, Highway Patrol Division (NHP) et al
as 3:2012cv00353
Defendant:
Clark, County Of, Donald Dice, Todd Ellison and others
Plaintiff:
Erik Lee, Matt Moonin and Donn Yarnall
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Forsythe v. Lippis et al
as 2:2011cv00498
Defendant:
Dianne Dickson, Jackie Glass, Thom Gover and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Forsythe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forsythe v. Glass et al
as 2:2011cv00098
Plaintiff:
Larry James Forsythe
Defendant:
Judge Jackie Glass, Thom Gover, Mr. Jones, Mr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2010cv00271
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Nevada, Renee Baker, David Barken and others
Petitioner:
Delask Pittman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thoms et al v. America's Servicing Company
as 2:2010cv00482
Defendant:
America's Servicing Company
Plaintiff:
Rodman Thoms and Roseline Thoms
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
