Cases 1 - 10 of 12,399
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv01091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Tresart, Inc. v. Galerie Thomas Modern et al
as 1:2024cv22269
Plaintiff:
Tresart, Inc.
Defendant:
Galerie Thomas Modern, Raimund Thomas, Sabine Riedlberger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Barfield v. Dixon et al
as 3:2024cv00601
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Barfield
Defendant:
Ricky Dixon, S. Pate, T.R. Mudd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Duval)
as 3:2024cv00595
Petitioner:
Deontrae Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Falvo v. Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
as 8:2024cv01412
Plaintiff:
Thomas Falvo
Defendant:
Atlantic Specialty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Kedrierski v. Coral Springs Improvement District
as 0:2024cv60988
Plaintiff:
Thomas Kedrierski
Defendant:
Coral Springs Improvement District
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2611 Family Medical Leave Act
Hazen v. Lear et al
as 3:2024cv00584
Plaintiff:
Mason R Hazen
Defendant:
Trey D Lear, Blake Gruny, Bradley M Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salem v. Burns et al
as 1:2024cv21509
Plaintiff:
Skylar Salem
Defendant:
William Burns, Chicago Police, Central Intelligence Agency and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
