Cases 1 - 10 of 499
Nevarez v. Thomas et al
as 1:2024cv00620
Plaintiff:
Saul Nevarez, Jr.
Defendant:
Ben Thomas and Steven J. Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith-Thomas v. Judges and Court Officials et al
as 1:2024cv00607
Plaintiff:
Cristyn Jeanette Smith-Thomas
Defendant:
Judges and Court Officials, David A Murphy, Courtney Weaks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez et al v. Vilsack et al
as 1:2024cv00572
Plaintiff:
Guadalupe Chavez, Lorenza Romero, Alice Sanchez and others
Defendant:
Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack, Villas De Avenida Canada, LLC and Bosley Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Murray v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Matthew Thomas Murray
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Thomas v. Redpoint County Mutual Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv00308
Plaintiff:
Larry Thomas
Defendant:
Redpoint County Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Thomas v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Truett Thomas
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Saul
as 1:2024cv00389
Plaintiff:
Ben Thomas
Defendant:
Roger S Saul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Saul v. Thomas
as 1:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Roger S Saul
Defendant:
Ben Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Thomas v. United States District Court et al
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Heather Mae Thomas
Defendant:
United States District Court and District of New Mexico Judges
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thigpen v. Anderson et al
as 1:2024cv00214
Plaintiff:
Richard Thomas Thigpen
Defendant:
Ian Anderson and Westlake Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
