Cases 1 - 10 of 3,174
Garvin v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02703
Plaintiff:
Thomas Garvin
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02507
Plaintiff:
William F. Thomas
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Stevens v. Davol, Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02552
Plaintiff:
Charles Thomas Stevens
Defendant:
Davol, Inc and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gist v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02474
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gist
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Fuller v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65642
Plaintiff:
Thomas Fuller
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Powell v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02450
Plaintiff:
Thomas Powell
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Olin v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65500
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas A. Olin
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Steele v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02405
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Steele, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
DAVENPORT v. MILLER et al
as 2:2024cv02364
Petitioner:
AUSTIN R. DAVENPORT
Respondent:
ANDY D. MILLER, DANEL J. CABLE, ESRA BETUL OZTURK and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cazantzes v. Mowder et al.
as 5:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
Eugene M. Cazantzes
Defendant:
Elizabeth Mowder, Thomas Mowder, State of Ohio and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
