Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Board of Trustees of the IBEW/NECA Sound & Communications Health & Welfare Trust Fund et al v. Streamline Integration et al
as 3:2022cv05342
Plaintiff:
Board of Trustees of the IBEW/NECA Sound & Communications Health & Welfare Trust Fund, IBEW Ninth District Pension Trust, Northern California Joint Apprenticeship and Training Trust and others
Defendant:
Streamline Integration and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. Streamline Integration et al
as 2:2021cv06261
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
Streamline Integration a California corporation doing business as Streamline System Designs and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan et al v. DVBE Electric, Inc. et al
as 5:2021cv01267
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Pension Plan, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Defined Contribution Trust Fund, Trustees of the Southern California IBEW-NECA Health Trust Fund and others
Defendant:
DVBE Electric, Inc. and Brian Thomas Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv08527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Brian Glick v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2012cv07443
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, Rene Bobadilla, City of El Monte and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Glick
Robert Roach v. City of El Monte et al
as 2:2012cv06476
Defendant:
Thomas Armstrong, Rene Bobadilla, City of El Monte and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Roach
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
