Cases 1 - 10 of 21
(PC) Bodnar v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2022cv01533
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Stephanie Clendenin and Brandon Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside, Sheriff's Department
as 5:2022cv00511
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
County of Riverside, Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside
as 5:2021cv01761
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Bodnar v. Clendenin et al
as 2:2018cv02702
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Jeremy Coles, Domingo Aguilar, James Rokop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Bodnar v. Maddax et al
as 1:2017cv00845
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
Maddax, P Johnson, S. Sisodia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside, et al
as 17-55277
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BODNAR
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, J. WHITTING, individually and as a Sheriff's Department Employee, T. TORRENTI, individually and as a Sheriff's Department Employee and others
Bodnar v. CDCR, et al.
as 1:2016cv01398
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Defendant:
California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, Maddox, P. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Bodnar v. County of Riverside et al
as 5:2016cv01825
Defendant:
C. Bianco, County of Riverside, DOES 1 through 2 and others
Plaintiff:
Thomas Bodnar
Bergeron Davila v. Bodnar et al
as 2:2016cv00291
Plaintiff:
Raymond J Bergeron Davila
Defendant:
Thomas Bodnar, John Doe, Gerad T Dougvillo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Bodnar v. Riverside County Sheriff's Dep
as 14-56071
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS BODNAR
Defendant - Appellee:
RIVERSIDE COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
