Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Coughlin v. Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv15971
Plaintiff:
Thomas Coughlin
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Botwinick et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11762
Plaintiff:
George Braadt, Timothy Cagney, Michael Capolino and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Styles v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2018cv01053
Plaintiff:
Larod Styles
Defendant:
James Cassidy, Kenneth Boudreau, Luke Daly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Cassidy (#2027) et al
as 1:2018cv01068
Plaintiff:
Troshawn McCoy
Defendant:
James Cassidy, Kenneth Boudreau, Luke Daly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson et al v. Cassidy et al
as 1:2018cv01062
Plaintiff:
Charles Johnson
Defendant:
James Cassidy, Kenneth Boudreau, Luke Daly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2018cv01049
Plaintiff:
LaShawn Ezell
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, James Cassidy, Kenneth Boudreau and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Heron v. Coughlin
as 14-2314
Petitioner:
Michael Owen Heron
Respondent:
Thomas Coughlin, III, Commissioner and Daniel A. Senkowski, Superintendent of Clinton Correctional Facility
Swift v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09155
Plaintiff:
Terrill Swift
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, Richard Paladino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thames v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09170
Plaintiff:
Vincent Thames
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, James Cassidy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Saunders v. Chicago et al
as 1:2012cv09158
Plaintiff:
Michael Saunders
Defendant:
City of Chicago, Kenneth Boudreau, Richard Paladino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
