Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
DAMUS et al v. NIELSEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv00578
Plaintiff: ANSLY DAMUS , N.J.J.R. , ABELARDO ASENSIO CALLOL and others
Defendant: KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN , THOMAS D. HOMAN , REBECCA ADDUCCI and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
RADZHABOV v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2018cv00254
Petitioner: FIRDAVS RADZHABOV
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
AISHAT v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY et al
as 1:2018cv00143
Plaintiff: AYMAN AISHAT
Defendant: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES, U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
BASANI v. NIELSEN et al
as 1:2017cv02646
Plaintiff: MARIA ANURAG REDDY BASANI
Defendant: KIRSTJEN M. NIELSEN, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS, III, L. FRANCIS CISSNA and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01505
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
DILLEY PRO BONO PROJECT et al v. U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT et al
as 1:2017cv01055
Plaintiff: DILLEY PRO BONO PROJECT , CAROLINE PERRIS and SHALYN FLUHARTY
Defendant: U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT , U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY , JOHN F. KELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT et al v. KOSKINEN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv00395
Plaintiff: BANCROFT GLOBAL DEVELOPMENT , MICHAEL STOCK and MELISSA BATES STOCK
Defendant: JOHN KOSKINEN, DOE 1-100 JOHN, JEFFERSON SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7428
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00761
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?