Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Washington-El v. Collins et al
as 3:2012cv01979
Plaintiff:
Chris Washington-El
Defendant:
Robert Collins, Anthony Kovalchik, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hilton Mincy v. Kenneth Chmielsewski, et al
as 12-1996
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HILTON KARRIEM MINCY
Defendant - Appellee:
KENNETH CHMIELSEWSKI, Deputy Superintendent, WILLIAM WETZEL, Lieutenant, J. E. VANCE, Officer and others
Williams v. Wenerowicz et al
as 1:2012cv00118
Plaintiff:
Vaughn Williams
Defendant:
Michael Wenerowicz, Robert Collins, Anthony Kovalchik and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Purcell Bronson, et al v. John W. Kerestes, et al
as 10-1632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PURCELL BRONSON
Defendant - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
BRENDA LYNN TRITT, THOMAS DERFLER, SHARON LUQUIS and others
Defendant - Appellee:
D. AMBRISTER and JOHN W. KERESTES
Debtor - Numerous Parties See Appellee:
O'BRIEN
Sandt v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2009cv01836
Plaintiff:
Danny Sandt
Defendant:
Kerestes, Bernadette Mason, Brenda L. Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bronson v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2009cv00269
Plaintiff:
Purcell Bronson
Defendant:
John W. Kerestes, Brenda L. Tritt, Thomas Derfler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Sekou v. Beard et al
as 3:2008cv00381
Plaintiff:
Mwangi Sekou
Defendant:
Jeffrey A. Beard, Ph.D., Department of Corrections, John Kerestes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2008cv00066
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, William C. Wetzel, Miknich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mincy v. Klem et al
as 1:2007cv00340
Plaintiff:
Hilton Karriem Mincy
Defendant:
Edward Klem, Kenneth Chmielewski, T. Temperine and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
