Cases
Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00819
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00707
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mathurin v. Barr
as 20-1810
Respondent: Chad F. Wolf, in his official capacity as Acting Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Jeffrey Searls, in his official capacity as Acting Assistant Field Office Director and Administrator, Buffalo Federal Detention Facility, Thomas E. Feeley, in his official capacity as Field Office Director, Buffalo Field Office, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Petitioner: Ravely Junior Mathurin
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv06365
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thomas v. Barr et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2020cv06362
Respondent: Thomas Brophy, Thomas E. Feeley, William P. Barr and others
Petitioner: Harvel Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00670
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 6:2020cv06355
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner: Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rangolan v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00628
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls, Chad Wolf, Thomas E. Feeley and others
Petitioner: Kevin Neville Rangolan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00584
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv06311
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?