Cases 11 - 20 of 62
Taylor v. Samouce et al
as 1:2015cv00627
Defendant:
Applied Quantitative Solutions, LLC, Mark Kyle and Michael Samouce
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Taylor, III
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Taylor v. USA
as 3:2015cv00776
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Taylor
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ralph Whitley, et al v. BP, P.L.C., et al
as 15-20282
Plaintiff - Appellee:
RALPH WHITLEY, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, FRANKIE RAMIREZ, DAVID HUMPHRIES and others
Defendant - Appellant:
BP, P.L.C., ANTHONY HAYWARD, SAVINGS PLAN INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and others
USA v. Thomas L. Taylor
as 15-1725
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS L. TAYLOR
USA v. Thomas L. Taylor
as 15-1643
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS L. TAYLOR
USA v. Thomas L. Taylor
as 15-1630
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
THOMAS L. TAYLOR
In Re: BP, P.L.C., et al
as 15-90010
Plaintiff - Respondent:
RALPH WHITLEY, Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, FRANKIE RAMIREZ, DAVID HUMPHRIES and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
BP, P.L.C., ANTHONY HAYWARD, SAVINGS PLAN INVESTMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE and others
Taylor v. Wallace et al
as 4:2015cv00272
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Taylor, III
Defendant:
David G. Wallace, Costa Bajjali, Laffer Frishberg Wallace Economic Opportunity Fund, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Taylor v. Gaucher
as 1:2014cv00965
Defendant:
Philip E. Gaucher
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Taylor, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754 Receiver of Property in Different District
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. Helms et al
as 3:2014mc00041
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Defendant:
ROBERT A HELMS, JANNIECE S KAELIN, DEVEN SELLERS and others
Receiver:
Thomas L Taylor, III
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
