Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Thomas FastIn re: Thomas Fast
as 23-10192
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS L. FAST
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Fast v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Manatee County)
as 8:2022cv01474
Petitioner:
Thomas L. East and Thomas L. Fast
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
In re: Thomas Fast
as 22-10362
Petitioner:
In re: THOMAS L. FAST
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Fast v. Alvarado et al
as 8:2021cv00339
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Fast
Defendant:
Garrett Franzen, Earl Moreland, Ricardo E. Alvarado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fast v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Manatee County)
as 8:2021cv00252
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Fast
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida, Secretary, Department of Corrections and Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fast v. No Named Defendants
as 1:2019cv03001
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Fast
Defendant:
No Named Defendants
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Fast v. Secretary, Department of Corr., et al
as 18-11071
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS L. FAST
Respondent - Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Fast v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2017cv02670
Petitioner:
Thomas L. Fast
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fast v. Alvarado et al
as 8:2016cv03285
Plaintiff:
Thomas L. Fast
Defendant:
Ricardo Alvarado, Unknown Herblilt and Lola Fay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2013cv00774
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
