Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Thomson v. McDonalds
as 1:2023cv00725
Plaintiff:
Meka Thomson
Defendant:
McDonalds
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 3410 Right to Financial Privacy Act
Ali Bey v. McCandless
as 1:2022cv00554
Plaintiff:
Maurice Marbury Elohim Ali Bey
Defendant:
Officer McCandless, Kellie Thomson, Cary Pardee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986 Neglect of Duty
Thomson v. CR Bard et al
as 2:2020cv05053
Defendant:
Davol, Inc., CR Bard and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Anita Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv04570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Thomson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03196
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Thomson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carter, et al. v. Monte Hamaoui, et al.
as 1:2014cv01854
Defendant:
City of Rocky River , Monte Hamaoui , James Baker and others
Plaintiff:
David W Carter , Our All American Recycling Co., Ltd and Robert L Thomson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bierley v. Thomson Reuters Group Pension Plan et al
as 1:2013cv00556
Plaintiff:
Linda Bierley
Defendant:
Thomson Reuters Group Pension Plan and Thompson Reuters Holdings Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Employee Pension Plan
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00013
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Davis v. Brouse McDowell et al
as 5:2008cv01356
Defendant:
Brouse McDowell, L.P.A., Brouse McDowell, L.P.A., Brouse McDowell, L.P.A. and others
Plaintiff:
Heather A Davis, Heather A Davis and Heather A Davis
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Peters et al v. Thomson, Inc.
as 3:2007cv00824
Plaintiff:
Lyle Peters, Dean Harmon and Glenn Whipple
Defendant:
Thomson, Inc., Thomson, Inc. and Thomson, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
