Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Garrett v. Lancaster County Jail et al
as 8:2016cv00180
Defendant:
Karen Bosn, Lancaster County Jail, Jodi Nelson and others
Plaintiff:
Robert T. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Thurber
as 8:2016cv00170
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clifford Louis Rush
Respondent:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Thurber et al
as 8:2015cv00442
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
Michael Thurber and Kevin Witcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reid v. Thurber
as 8:2015cv00349
Petitioner:
John T. Reid, III
Respondent:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Medina v. Thurber et al
as 8:2015cv00332
Defendant:
Chief Medical Officer, Brenda Fisher, Bradley Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rush v. Zimmerman et al
as 8:2015cv00236
Plaintiff:
Clifford L. Rush
Defendant:
Shafer, Michael Thurber and J. Zimmerman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medina v. Thurber
as 8:2014cv00301
Plaintiff:
Ernest Medina
Defendant:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dieteman v. Lancaster County et al
as 4:2014cv03053
Plaintiff:
Cory L. Dieteman
Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-10, Douglas County Adult Detention Center, Mark Foxall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Rush v. Thurber
as 4:2012cv03253
Interested Party:
Nebraska Attorney General
Petitioner:
Clifford Rush
Respondent:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bush v. Thurber
as 4:2012cv03195
Plaintiff:
Charlie B. Bush, Jr.
Defendant:
Michael Thurber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
