Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Turner v. Henderson et al
as 1:2018cv00655
Plaintiff:
Randy Turner
Defendant:
Thurman L. Henderson, Garland R. Hunt and L. Gale Buckner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stanley v. Henderson et al
as 5:2016cv00030
Plaintiff:
Brandon Stanley
Defendant:
Thurman L. Henderson, FNU Brown, Pardon and Parole Board and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bacon v. Henderson et al
as 6:2015cv00139
Plaintiff:
Terry Bacon
Defendant:
Thurman L. Henderson and Jerry Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Henderson v. Hutchinson et al
as 1:2015cv01117
Plaintiff:
Julius Everett Henderson, Jr.
Defendant:
George F. Hutchinson , III, Gwinnett County, Justin Combs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GREEN v. BARNARD et al
as 7:2015cv00044
Plaintiff:
MARK ANTHONY GREEN
Defendant:
TERRY E BARNARD, JAMES W MILLS, BRAXTON T COTTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Collins v. Nix et al
as 1:2014cv00674
Plaintiff:
Rodney Collins
Defendant:
Milton E. Nix, Jr., Garland R. Huat, Garfield Hammonds, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NELMS v. STATE BOARD OF PARDON AND PAROLE et al
as 5:2013cv00167
Plaintiff:
JOHN NELMS
Defendant:
STATE BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES and THURMAN L HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dawud v. Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles et al
as 1:2012cv02928
Plaintiff:
Wali Malik Dawud
Defendant:
Georgia Board of Pardons and Paroles, James E. Donald, Albert R. Murray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton et al v. State Bar of Georgia et al
as 1:2012cv01501
Plaintiff:
Eddie James Burton
Defendant:
State Bar of Georgia, Paula J. Frederick, John J. Shiptenko and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Goodman v. Donald et al
as 1:2012cv00870
Plaintiff:
Tony Goodman
Defendant:
James E. Donald, Thurman L. Henderson, W. C. Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
